Submission details
mtech's
PCMark 2005 score
- Overclockers League
34911 marks with Xeon X5667 at 5610MHz
Ranking position
n/a
Global 4x CPU rank:
1st
Xeon X5667 rank:
1st
out of 2
Points earned
-
Global Points (UGP) Not mtech’s best submission.
0.0 points
-
Hardware Points (UHP) 1st using Xeon X5667
2.0 points
-
Global Team Power Points (GTPP) Not Team MXS ModLabs.net’s best submission.
0.0 points
-
Hardware Team Power Points (HTPP) 1 team using Xeon X5667
5.3 points
Media gallery
- Verification URL, image, checksum
- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=2325704
Hardware details
CPU details
- Model: Xeon X5667 'Westmere-EP'
- Cooling: Cascade Phase Change Cooling
- Speed: 3,066 @ 5,610MHz
Memory details
- Type: DDR3 SDRAM
VGA details
- Model: Radeon HD 5870 (RV870)
- Cooling: Single Stage Phase Change Cooling
- Clockspeed: 850/1,200 (stock) @ 1,165/1,285 MHz
Mainboard details
- Model: Rampage II Extreme
- Chipset: X58




Recent Comments
Xeon X5667(4cores)@5610MHz 1.73V cascade cooled, Asus Rampage II Extreme, Radeon 5870@1165@1285 1.45V SS cooled, 6Gb Kingston DDR3@1795 6-6-6-20-1T 1.78V, 4xGigabyte I-RAM+Acard ANS9010 RAID0@ICH10R, Antec TPQ-1000
HDD Tests rock -) How's the PCI-E RAID controller doing? No changes?
HDD Tests are really bad in comparison with my competitors (~247 HDD General usage in my case vs >600 HDD General Usage). With Adaptec 5805 scores are even worse.
Adaptec's controllers were always junk :) What did you run on I-ram's and what on Acard? How do they perform comparing to each other?
I used IDE WD800BB as a system drive, 4xI-RAMs+ACARD 9010@ICH10R as PCMark drive. 3xI-RAMs RAID0 performs similar to ACARD 9010 in RAID0 mode: I-RAMs are faster in Virus Scan, but slower in General Usage.
says:
awesome, grats!
Nice score, man!
nice score. Congrats :)
Thank you :)
Nice man!
Very Nice...
Please log in or register to comment.