Submission Details
Monstru`s PCMark05 (alpha) score - Elite League
20859 marks with Intel Core i7 870 at 4800MHz
Ranking position
n/a
Global 4x CPU rank:
9th
Core i7 870 rank:
9th out of 23
Points earned for overclocker league
-
Global Points
Not Monstru's best submission
-
Hardware Points
9th using Core i7 870
Points earned for team league
-
Global Team Power Points (GTPP) Not lab501.ro's best submission
0.0 Points
-
Hardware Team Power Points (HTPP) 9th in team using Core i7 870
0.0 Points
Hardware details
CPU details
- Model: Intel Core i7 870 'Lynnfield'
- Cooling: Liquid Nitrogen
- Cores: 4,800MHz(+63.82%)
-
Memory details
- Type: 4048MB DDR3 SDRAM
- Speed: @ 800MHz
- Timings: CL8.0 8-8-24
VGA details
- Model: GeForce GTX 295 (GT200) NVIDIA
- Cooling: Air (Stock)
- Speed: 576MHz (stock) / 999MHz (stock)
Mainboard details
- Manufacturer: GIGABYTE
- Model: GA-P55-UD6
- Chipset: P55
-
Recent Comments
Monstru commented on his own score:
Intel Core i7 870 @ 4800MHz w LN2, Gigabyte P55-UD6, 2x2GB A-Data DDR3 2200 CL8
Monstru says:
Guys, this is done with one G2 Intel SSD. I have no FM link, but the result is not in global TOP 20, and I do not think that the score is out of line for the hardware used.
noxon says:
The subtests are missing on the screenshot as far as i can see.
* use default PCMark settings
* have a valid screenshot (see example below): clearly show PCmark score, PCmark settings, processor in CPU-Z, GPU-Z, Subtest Scores (XP startup speed!), unless you have a valid futuremark ORB url
* have a valid futuremark orb link as verification for scores in the top 20
So rerun, and break 21k
Monstru says:
- Not top20 result
- Not out of the ordinary performance for the specific settings.
- Not directed to other people then the HWB Staff (this thread)
Monstru says:
Mind the language...
We have this policy to allow results that are not out of the ordinary for the specific settings even if they are mising some tab or something like that. I we would NOT have that policy, half of the results on HWBot would be gone.
Yes I did not click the details button, I considered that a shit result and I didn't think it would last in Lynnfield top more then 1-2 weeks. If my results offends anyone so much, I can delete it.
knopflerbruce says:
If that's the case, maybe you can unblock my blocked GF6800 score? Always wondered how a score that's 9/10 can get blocked because of missing resolution:p
link: http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=690179
On topic: IMO that score shouldn't be blocked if it's not better than what you'd expect from an untweaked, similar system. However, someone once told me that mods should be expected to follow the rules much more strictly than other members... can't remember who that was, maybe Massman?
Monstru says:
I repeat, if that helps people understand, I will delete that score myself. There will not be much global points for it in Rev 3 anyway, I just like to keep it as a souvenir
[GF]Duke says:
xp Startup values are not posted.Thats a biggie.
Please log in or register to comment.