Submission details

avatar

Belgium Massman's 3DMark2001 SE score - Professional Overclockers League

123740 marks with Radeon HD 4890 at 1150/1125MHz

Ranking position

n/a

Global 1x GPU rank:

11th

Radeon HD 4890 rank:

11th out of 216

Points earned

Media gallery

Screenshots
3DMark2001 SE screenshot
screenshot
screenshot
screenshot
Flare
Flare
Youtube

Hardware details

CPU details

  • Model: Core i7 2600K 'Sandy Bridge'
  • Cooling: Liquid Nitrogen
  • Speed: 3,400 @ 5,710MHz

Memory details

  • Manufacturer: G.SKILL
  • Product: Flare
  • Cooling: Air Cooling
  • Type: 4096MB DDR3 SDRAM
  • Clockspeed: @ 1,108MHz
  • Timings: CL6.0 9-6-39

VGA details

  • Model: Radeon HD 4890 (RV790)
  • Cooling: Liquid Nitrogen
  • Clockspeed: 850/900 (stock) @ 1,150/1,125 MHz

Mainboard details

Disk details

Power details

Recent Comments

Belgium Massman commented on his own score:

Good CH run (first run I complete with good CH). Nature, DH and LH 'okay', other's a bit low. 124k possible with this setup - maybe for later.

France Eeky NoX says:

Nice run Massman :) Good chip btw

TaPaKaH says:

would be interesting CF with these cards, even with nature at 1600-1700fps

Italy Iron says:

Nice run Pieter, but I think Nature is a bit slow... when I did the 3dm01 run with the 4870@1,110GHz gpu, I was at 1128fps... so probably here is the UD7 that limits the score, given that you have 200mhz more for the cpu and 40mhz more for the gpu. Can't you try this setup with an UD4 or UD5? I think you should get around 125K just by changing the mobo. :)

France Eeky NoX says:

Agree with you about that board. I have strange scores with it, especially 03 :(

TaPaKaH says:

|ron said: Nature is a bit slow
could be because of the fact that 4890 is slightly slower than 4870 at same clocks

Italy Iron says:

Sam OCX said: could be because of the fact that 4890 is slightly slower than 4870 at same clocks
Didn't know that, Sam. I didn't do a comparative run, but this Monday we're going to do a run with our 4890, we'll try to use same frequencies, so we could quantify the "delta" between 4870 and 4890 :)

Australia dinos22 says:

Not far from 124K go go go :)

United States Hondacity says:

why later? lol procastinator!

United Kingdom k3vst3r says:

Nice work good chip :)

Belgium Massman says:

|ron said: Nice run Pieter, but I think Nature is a bit slow... when I did the 3dm01 run with the 4870@1,110GHz gpu, I was at 1128fps... so probably here is the UD7 that limits the score, given that you have 200mhz more for the cpu and 40mhz more for the gpu.
Can't you try this setup with an UD4 or UD5?
I think you should get around 125K just by changing the mobo. :)


Hm. In your 124k run?
[hwbot=2163352]submission[/hwbot]

You're at 5850MHz with the CPU. I've only got 5710MHz, which makes quite a difference even in Nature. That being said, I did have this run on the UD4:
[hwbot=2099979]submission[/hwbot]

1100FPS with only 1000 core. Not sure if it was part of the tweaking, but ever since I started working with the UD7, I felt nature was a tad slow.

United States k|ngp|n says:

"Nature, DH and LH 'okay' " ....Define ok my man :D
Not bad!

Italy Iron says:

Nono Pieter, I was referring to this one, the last with the 4870 at high freqs and with a non-alien cpu :D http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2159077_aoc_3dmark2001_se_radeon_hd_4870_120408_marks

Please log in or register to comment.