scooter.jay 说：

13 year and 9 months ago –

Good score beats the one i was saving well done.

cyclone 说：

13 year and 9 months ago –

Congrats on another Sempron milestone! -)

Don_Dan 说：

13 year and 9 months ago –

Nice score, hope it will stay first until the end of the competition!

Christian Ney 说：

13 year and 9 months ago –

16K , who's next ?

Linuxfan 说：

13 year and 9 months ago –

Good work!

G.Foyle 说：

13 year and 9 months ago –

Thanks guys I haven't had that much fun with overclocking since a looong time. Judging by how much power was left in my setup I was sure someone would pull a 17k backup in the last minutes....

Massman 说：

13 year and 9 months ago –

What's the Virus scan in this run?

G.Foyle 说：

13 year and 9 months ago –

I knew you would ask, so I included an ORB link

It's 154 MB/s. I didn't have the problems you guys had, I was getting such high scores consistently. Maybe it's because I used a dedicated RAID controller instead of SB?

Massman 说：

13 year and 9 months ago –

It's got something to do with the nature of the subtest: it's designed to test multi-threaded applications. The Sempron 145 is single core ánd has no L3 cache, which makes it have a buttload of problems in multi-threaded situations: one of the four subtests at once and no cache to store instructions or data.

I think your RAID controller's cache might be allowing the CPU to get data quicker or so. I'll try to see how this subtest scales when using an SSD raid config for OS and Acard as PCMark05 bench drive