Submission Details
8 Pack`s 3DMark Vantage - Performance Ergebnis - Elite League
57401 marks mit NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 at 1610/1959MHz
Ranglisten Position
n.a.
Globaler 1x GPU Rang:
n/a
GeForce GTX 680 Rang:
Points earned for overclocker league
-
Globale Punkte (UGP)
Not 8 Pack's best submission
-
Hardware Punkte (UHP)
Not 8 Pack's best GeForce GTX 680 submission
0.0 Punkte
Points earned for team league
-
Globale Team Power Punkte (GTPP) Not Caseking & OcUK OC Team's best submission
0.0 Punkte
-
Hardware Team Power Punkte (HTPP) Not Caseking & OcUK OC Team's best GeForce GTX 680 submission
0.0 Punkte
Mediengallerie
- Verifikations URL, Bilder, Checksumme
- http://www.3dmark.com/3dmv/4484655
Hardware Details
CPU Details
- Model: Intel Core i7 3930K 'Sandy Bridge-E'
- Kühlung: Single Stage Phase Change
- Cores: 5.644Mhz(+76.37%)
-
Arbeitsspeicher Details
- Produkt: Xtreem LV
- Kühlung: Air (Stock)
- Typ: 16384MB DDR3 SDRAM
- Geschwindigkeit: @ 1.254Mhz
- Timings: CL10.0 12-12-28 1T
VGA Details
- Model: GeForce GTX 680 (GK104) NVIDIA
- Kühlung: Cascade Phase Change
- Geschwindigkeit: 1.610Mhz (+60.04%) / 1.959Mhz (+30.43%)
Mainboard Details
- Hersteller: ASUS
- Model: Rampage IV Extreme
- Kühlung: Air (Custom)
- Chipsatz: X79
-
Neueste Kommentare
Mehdi_FXX sagt:
Congrats!GPU 1610 & memory 1959! @ 57.5K GPU Score!!! WTF??? I don`t know but it seems memory has Crazy efficency or something else!
8 Pack sagt:
CPU was at 135.1 BLK for GPU tests and 134.3 for CPU Tests. BLK and memory speed defo helped alot along with selecting the best GPU speed where you gain most from Boost. Which for me gave worse results with the card above this frequency. Strange I know but I can only put it down to the level of boost being applied being dynamic somehow.
SF3D sagt:
Very nice result and with that type of cooling it's even more impressive
You should put the max boost frequency in the submission as it already caused confusion to Mehdi. In my case 1610 would mean 1960MHz but you are running MSI, so I have no idea.
8 Pack sagt:
Boost made a massive difference as you say. But its dynamic I think so what would you put??? I did not want to confuse I just genuinely don't know what figure to put down.
Mehdi_FXX sagt:
agree with Petri, Clock would mean ~ 1960
so you wanna say Boost Max clock is 1610? Boost can not make this massive efficiency!
SF3D sagt:
Well, we can all agree that Nvidia could make it more simple But the performance in benchmarks comes from the max clocks and if you have some monitoring software open you should see straight flat line at ~1960MHz during that run. It does not matter that much, but for some users it might be confusing if 680 is not familiar.
8 Pack sagt:
I understand that guys. I will be posting more results with this card so I will enter Max boost clock and add a note to the post saying I have done this. Thanks for your imput.
Strat sagt:
Strong result man, congratz for the good work
8 Pack sagt:
Thanks man!!!!
Rbuass sagt:
Good job man
8 Pack sagt:
Thanks Bud.
Hiwa sagt:
Nice job
8 Pack sagt:
Thanks. I am trying!!!
Bitte einloggen oder register to comment.