Submission Details

avatar

- Elite League

57401 marks avec NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 à 1610/1959MHz

Position dans le classement

n/a

Global 1x GPU classement:

n/a

GeForce GTX 680 classement:

Points earned for overclocker league

Points earned for team league

Gallerie photos

Captures d'écran
3DMark Vantage - Performance screenshot
Rampage IV Extreme
Rampage IV Extreme
URL, image ou code de vérification
http://www.3dmark.com/3dmv/4484655

Détails matériel

Détails Processeur

  • Modèle: Intel Core i7 3930K 'Sandy Bridge-E'
  • Refroidissement: Single Stage Phase Change
  • Cores: 5 644MHz(+76.37%)
  • buy on amazon

Détails mémoire

  • Produit: Xtreem LV
  • Refroidissement: Air (Stock)
  • Type: 16384MB DDR3 SDRAM
  • Fréquence: @ 1 254MHz
  • Chronomètres CL10.0 12-12-28 1T

Détails carte graphique

  • Modèle: GeForce GTX 680 (GK104) NVIDIA
  • Refroidissement: Cascade Phase Change
  • Fréquence: 1 610MHz (+60.04%) / 1 959MHz (+30.43%)
  • buy on amazon

Détails carte mère

Détails disque

Détails alimentation

Commentaires récents

IranMehdi_FXX dit :

Congrats!GPU 1610 & memory 1959! @ 57.5K GPU Score!!! WTF??? I don`t know but it seems memory has Crazy efficency or something else!

United Kingdom8 Pack dit :

CPU was at 135.1 BLK for GPU tests and 134.3 for CPU Tests. BLK and memory speed defo helped alot along with selecting the best GPU speed where you gain most from Boost. Which for me gave worse results with the card above this frequency. Strange I know but I can only put it down to the level of boost being applied being dynamic somehow.

FinlandSF3D dit :

Very nice result and with that type of cooling it's even more impressive :D

 

You should put the max boost frequency in the submission as it already caused confusion to Mehdi. In my case 1610 would mean 1960MHz but you are running MSI, so I have no idea.

United Kingdom8 Pack dit :

Boost made a massive difference as you say. But its dynamic I think so what would you put??? I did not want to confuse I just genuinely don't know what figure to put down.

IranMehdi_FXX dit :

agree with Petri, Clock would mean ~ 1960

 

so you wanna say Boost Max clock is 1610? Boost can not make this massive efficiency!

FinlandSF3D dit :

Well, we can all agree that Nvidia could make it more simple :D But the performance in benchmarks comes from the max clocks and if you have some monitoring software open you should see straight flat line at ~1960MHz during that run. It does not matter that much, but for some users it might be confusing if 680 is not familiar.

United Kingdom8 Pack dit :

I understand that guys. I will be posting more results with this card so I will enter Max boost clock and add a note to the post saying I have done this. Thanks for your imput.

FranceStrat dit :

Strong result man, congratz for the good work :)

United Kingdom8 Pack dit :

Thanks man!!!!

BrazilRbuass dit :

Good job man ;)

United Kingdom8 Pack dit :

Thanks Bud.

Hiwa dit :

Nice job

United Kingdom8 Pack dit :

Thanks. I am trying!!!

Veuillez vous identifier ou enregister pour commenter