Submission Details

- Elite League

9min 34sec 78ms mit AMD FX-9370 at 7876MHz

Ranglisten Position

5178th

WR Rang:

5178th von 8960

5178th

Globale Rangliste

5178th von 8960

1st

FX-9370 Rang:

Cup Gold 1st von 22

Points earned for overclocker league

Points earned for team league

Mediengallerie

Bildschirmphoto
verfication image
SuperPi - 32M screenshot
screenshot
screenshot
screenshot
Flare
Flare
Verifikations URL, Bilder, Checksumme
http://valid.canardpc.com/izcjkx

Hardware Details

CPU Details

  • Model: AMD FX-9370 'Vishera'
  • Kühlung: Liquid Nitrogen
  • Temperatur (°C): -175 Last-186 Leerlauf26 (Umgebung)
  • Batch:
  • Cores: 7.876Mhz(+79.00%)(ref/imc/qpi: 267/3.783/Mhz)
  • buy on amazon

Arbeitsspeicher Details

  • Manufacturer: G.SKILL
  • Produkt: Flare
  • Kühlung: Air (Stock)
  • Typ: 4096MB DDR3 SDRAM
  • Geschwindigkeit: @ 1.246Mhz
  • Timings: 9-11-8-24-1T
  • buy on amazon

VGA Details

  • Model: Radeon HD 7750 (Cape Verde) AMD
  • Kühlung: Air (Stock)
  • Geschwindigkeit: 800Mhz / 1.125Mhz (Bestand)
  • buy on amazon

Mainboard Details

Festplatten Details

Netzteil Details

Neueste Kommentare

FinlandThe Stilt Kommentierte sein eigenes Ergebnis:

FX-9370... On FX-9 series standards = Ultra low leak On FX-8 series standards = Ultra high leak Real core voltage = ~ 1.88V (1.400V + 0.475V offset) under load, UD7 does not seem to report anything accurate for CPU voltages or temperatures. Mods on board: - Slow Mode (a physical switch, check the picture), took 1.5 hours just to find the trace... - NCC PSE (560uF) series polymers in VRM loop 2 (CPU) replaced with FPCAP 10K 820uF caps. The additional 2600uF of bulk seemed to help...

United Statessteponz sagt:

Very nice :)

BelgiumMassman sagt:

Odd choice of memory divider. In my testing, 3:10 > 1:4 > 3:14 for memory performance (http://forum.hwbot.org/showpost.php?p=136877&postcount=37)

FinlandThe Stilt sagt:

Odd choice of memory divider. In my testing, 3:10 > 1:4 > 3:14 for memory performance (http://forum.hwbot.org/showpost.php?p=136877&postcount=37)

 

I calibrate the RdPtrInit etc values by hand.

There is no difference in performance after that.

 

The different DRAM Pll Multiplier + Divider combinations result different duty cycles, however they do not have effect on performance.

 

Besides, my PSCs (the PCB) was damaged after running on UP4.

It is not a very good idea to extract the modules when they are frozen solid into the slot...

 

Previously DDR-2666 with 9-11-8 timings was not a issue, now around DDR-2500 is the maximum.

United StatesBeepBeep2 sagt:

Your result is magnificent, congrats :) sorry to hear about your Flares.

PolandXtreme Addict sagt:

outstanding :)

 

South AfricaVivi sagt:

too smart lol!

FlanK3r sagt:

AMD WR, you are beast man! :)

AustraliaDinos22 sagt:

lol massman, one does not simply question The Stilt.

 

Well done man!

United KingdomHiVizMan sagt:

An outstanding run - I hope you get to the 9.30 mark first as in my view you certainly deserve it. I agree with your statement (on another forum) that frequency of the memories plays far higher a role than uber tight ones. Even on single channel. :D

 

You have inspired many past AMD benchers to return to the benching tables and give AMD another go and for that I thank you.

Hungarysubaruwrc sagt:

You have the 267*30 spi 32m don't you ? ;):)

Indonesiaspeed.fastest sagt:

Very nice hard mod! Gigabyte 990FX SOC lol :P

Bitte einloggen oder register to comment.