Submission Details

- Elite League

9min 34sec 78ms avec AMD FX-9370 à 7876MHz

Position dans le classement

5178th

WR Rank:

5178th sur un total de 8960

5178th

Classement général:

5178th sur un total de 8960

1st

FX-9370 classement:

Cup Gold 1st sur un total de 22

Points earned for overclocker league

Points earned for team league

Gallerie photos

Captures d'écran
verfication image
SuperPi - 32M screenshot
screenshot
screenshot
screenshot
Flare
Flare
URL, image ou code de vérification
http://valid.canardpc.com/izcjkx

Détails matériel

Détails Processeur

  • Modèle: AMD FX-9370 'Vishera'
  • Refroidissement: Liquid Nitrogen
  • Temperature (°C): -175 (charge)-186 (repos)26 (ambiente)
  • Lot:
  • Cores: 7 876MHz(+79.00%)(ref/imc/qpi: 267/3 783/MHz)
  • buy on amazon

Détails mémoire

  • Manufacturer: G.SKILL
  • Produit: Flare
  • Refroidissement: Air (Stock)
  • Type: 4096MB DDR3 SDRAM
  • Fréquence: @ 1 246MHz
  • Chronomètres 9-11-8-24-1T
  • buy on amazon

Détails carte graphique

  • Modèle: Radeon HD 7750 (Cape Verde) AMD
  • Refroidissement: Air (Stock)
  • Fréquence: 800MHz / 1 125MHz (Stock)
  • buy on amazon

Détails carte mère

Détails disque

Détails alimentation

Commentaires récents

FinlandThe Stilt a commenté son propre score:

FX-9370... On FX-9 series standards = Ultra low leak On FX-8 series standards = Ultra high leak Real core voltage = ~ 1.88V (1.400V + 0.475V offset) under load, UD7 does not seem to report anything accurate for CPU voltages or temperatures. Mods on board: - Slow Mode (a physical switch, check the picture), took 1.5 hours just to find the trace... - NCC PSE (560uF) series polymers in VRM loop 2 (CPU) replaced with FPCAP 10K 820uF caps. The additional 2600uF of bulk seemed to help...

United Statessteponz dit :

Very nice :)

BelgiumMassman dit :

Odd choice of memory divider. In my testing, 3:10 > 1:4 > 3:14 for memory performance (http://forum.hwbot.org/showpost.php?p=136877&postcount=37)

FinlandThe Stilt dit :

Odd choice of memory divider. In my testing, 3:10 > 1:4 > 3:14 for memory performance (http://forum.hwbot.org/showpost.php?p=136877&postcount=37)

 

I calibrate the RdPtrInit etc values by hand.

There is no difference in performance after that.

 

The different DRAM Pll Multiplier + Divider combinations result different duty cycles, however they do not have effect on performance.

 

Besides, my PSCs (the PCB) was damaged after running on UP4.

It is not a very good idea to extract the modules when they are frozen solid into the slot...

 

Previously DDR-2666 with 9-11-8 timings was not a issue, now around DDR-2500 is the maximum.

United StatesBeepBeep2 dit :

Your result is magnificent, congrats :) sorry to hear about your Flares.

PolandXtreme Addict dit :

outstanding :)

 

South AfricaVivi dit :

too smart lol!

FlanK3r dit :

AMD WR, you are beast man! :)

AustraliaDinos22 dit :

lol massman, one does not simply question The Stilt.

 

Well done man!

United KingdomHiVizMan dit :

An outstanding run - I hope you get to the 9.30 mark first as in my view you certainly deserve it. I agree with your statement (on another forum) that frequency of the memories plays far higher a role than uber tight ones. Even on single channel. :D

 

You have inspired many past AMD benchers to return to the benching tables and give AMD another go and for that I thank you.

Hungarysubaruwrc dit :

You have the 267*30 spi 32m don't you ? ;):)

Indonesiaspeed.fastest dit :

Very nice hard mod! Gigabyte 990FX SOC lol :P

Veuillez vous identifier ou enregister pour commenter